Current Size: 100%
Disclaimer: Before I begin, I would like to state that "Happy Puppy Clown World" is a description coined by a friend of mine, James, who used it to describe the general nature of people in LARP who seek cooperative and equitable solutions while playing in a game based on intrigue, chicanery, distrust, and backstabbing.
Although I look out on this world and hope that somehow human nature will change and that we would all love our neighbors as ourselves, I am a realist. I know that good people die trying to do what is right and criminals walk away from their crimes and the innocent suffer. I don't like it, and I do what I can in my life to be a decent human.
I also understand the desire to use fiction as an escape and to create that utopian view of life that all the good guys live and all the bad guys get what comes to them. This is especially prevalent in the AU aspect of HP fanfiction, and it smacks of childess daydreaming more than a realistic portrayal of a struggle between a boy and a sadistic murdering madman.
Conflict is plot. Man versus man and Man versus society are meant to be struggles not the feel good movie of the week. If I wanted that, I'd watch reruns of Leave it to Beaver. The story of Harry Potter is the story of a young boy caught up in the life and death struggle of a society literally being torn apart by prejudice, hate, and corruption. There are many moments of good cheer and frivolity, but that does not mean that Harry's relationship with whomever can ever take precedence over the looming shadow of Voldemort.
Harry's life will be haunted and directed by the actions of Voldemort on Harry himself and those around Harry. Yet many authors take the stand that Harry should have it easy and either do so through making him powerful, making hi all-knowing, making VOldemort stupid, or giving the answer to his defeat in a book Hermione found in the library.
Where is the development for Harry in that? Where is the struggle that he endures that changes him from a boy to a man? Where are the casualties in his fight against the most feared wizard ever known?
They are not there. They are toned down, and they are bland and often trite passing waves at conflict as they run off to the saloon to party. And although there is a place for Spaghetti Western Fanfic, I am tired of people taking that frivolity as monumental achievements of writing.
Fanfiction is meant to explore possibilities and to expand the stories of the world and characters. A one-shot can be simple and focused and fluffy, but an epic needs more meat. More and more AU's I read have significant events, literally life defining events for Harry, modified so that the good guys always win.
Harry's childhood is blissful and loving.
Sirius doesn't die because Harry is smarter or Sirius is better or someone was forewarned.
Dumbledore never picked up the ring.
James or Lily survived that night.
Remus and/or Tonks survive the final battle.
Fred survives the final battle.
Draco gets a backbone.
Cedric lives.
Additionally, there are many stories where Sirius is given a wife, Remus is given a wife, James and Lily have additional kids, Severus becomes a nice guy and there are thousands of babies and siblings all over the place and although there are some "scary moments' nothing really ever bad happens to any of the characters.
What does this prove? What is the point of this story? That the author can take a puppy and put a bow on it and say doesn't this make you feel good? Of course it makes you feel good! Any idiot can slap a happy ever after together and people will go awww.
But do you want to know a little secret? Lord Voldemort is nor Sir Cares-a-lot. He is the most feared wizard in who knows how many centuries and is more powerful the Dumbledore, yet obviously, according to these Happy Puppy Clown World authors, he can't think his way out of a wet paper sack.
Let me be blunt, throughout history there have been more people whose names have been immortalized because of the terror that they induced than those who leave good works behind. Attila, Xerces, Alexander, Nero, Caligula, Hitler, Napoleon, Mao, Rasputin, Stalin, Hito, Truman . . . do I need to name more?
These people changed the world and the methods they used caused the deaths of millions of human beings. Lord Voldemort wishes to change the world. He wishes to tear down British society and re make it in his image. Do you think a few thousand people tortured, killed, and displaced are going to matter to him? Do you think that those in the front lines trying to prevent this are going to be ignored while he focuses on nameless Muggles and wizards and witches?
Yes, Harry is the hero. Yes, Harry will be faced with trials and heartache, but it is not meant to be a summer stroll for him. He needs the adversity and loss and suffering that bring him to the point where he is willing to give his life to save the world. And unfortunately, that will involve the death of characters close to Harry.
It is very easy for an author to not kill a character. It takes guts and fortitude to take a main or secondary character and end their life. That means something when it happens. That means more than any million nameless deaths that Voldemort causes.
Do you want to change Sirius' death? Then make his death meaningful instead of trite and random as Rowling did. Don't chicken out and have Tonks and Remus die off stage. Let Neville die beheading Nagini. Have Hermione broken in Malfoy manner instead of just Crucio'ed a few times. Have more people die earlier. Let the basilisk kill someone. Show that life isn't always fair, but that people still fight against the growing darkness and never give up. That each death galvanizes more to act and fight.
Yes, reviewers will howl at you and write scathing reviews, but as long as you make the hard choices and make the plot realistic, and do it with a purpose and not just randomly, you will have a much better story.
-Jonathan
Comments
Happy Puppy Clown Worlds
I'm still snickering over that phrase! Thanks Jonathan. I often wonder if the "Happy Puppy" world authors tend to be younger and female. Being someone who's birthdate was in the previous millennia, I like my characters darker. Let's face it, the Weasleys are a bunch of troublemakers with bad tempers. Ginny is downright vicious. There are two differences between Sirius and his cousin Bellatrix in the TLT world: (1) Sirius is NOT in Azkaban, and (2) Sirius is on the Order's side. For anything else it is easy to understand they are first cousins.
That's close to my name for people who write like that
Hugs and Puppy people they get called in my home
I do enjoy my characters with an edge, i like to play on their faults as well
In my current fic, Harry will be stronger but that's due to some training form 6 onwards, not just magical but in his whole education. My take on this is that his arrogance and his temper will come into play more, he will have a slight god complex but events will drive that from him, Ginny gets the same treatment as Harry
Life isn't good, life isn't fair. Deal with it, some things work out some don't. People live and people die, death doesn't respect main characters, come to think of it nor do i
Yes, but....
There's danger in going too far the other way, too. War is hell, and bad things will happen to good people. But some authors seem to take the path of making sure that something really bad happens to every good person, resulting in, at best, a Pyrrhic victory. The story ends up as an almost repetitive attack against the protagonists on the part of the author, and that is neither good writing nor good thinking. If you (the author) are going to tear apart absolutely everything Harry (or another protagonist) values, then do it for a good reason. Don't just do it because you enjoy watching them suffer, or because your readers are very responsive when horrible things happen in your story.
"Life's a bitch, and then you die," isn't such a bad summary of the reality of war. Those authors, however, are saying something like, "Life's a bitch, and then you get slapped around a lot, and then all of your friends get slaughtered in various inventively cruel ways, and then your 'Beloved' gets brutalized and/or mutilated and/or killed and/or subverted against his/her/its will, and then you're crippled for the rest of your now-valueless life, and then, if you're lucky, you might die. Oh, and the bad guy dies, too, by the way."
That said, I have a name for the fics Jonathan mentioned, too. I call them "Sunshine and daisies" fics.
Why did you have to steal my
Why did you have to steal my next blog entry? I was even going to title it "Megolomania and the Authors Who Like to Kill Puppies"
Oh well, I did open the can of worms.
Yes, as I said in my post death and suffering must be for a reason. It is not there to create suspense or cliffhangers every chapter. It needs to be used to bring an element of uncertainty for the reader. Even though the reader knows the main character will live to the end of the book at least, the suspense that realism brings to a book often causes the reader to be on the edge of their seat, sighing in relief every time the hero narrowly escapes or is captured or loses a friend. However, there is a balance between suspense and annoyance.
One of the reasons I hate Refiner's Fire and its sequel is that the author rolls around in Harry's near death experiences or his friends betraying him. It shows a great lack of imagination if the only way you can create conflict is through cliffhangers and injuring the main character. Not to mention that the relationships are romance novel sappy.
One of the things I love the most about MoO is that plot is not centered around Soap Opera plot even though a great deal of the conflict is due to the personal relationships between Alex and the Weasley family and the professors. Dave balances it nicely, and that is quite a difficult job.
-Jonathan
- A good novel is an indivisible sum; every scene, sequence and passage of a good novel has to involve, contribute to and advance all three of its major attributes: theme, plot, characterization.
Ayn Rand - The Romantic Manifesto p. 74 (pb 93)
Come on! Everyone knows
Come on! Everyone knows that Voldemort isn't Sir-Care-alot. He's really Wizard No Heart and wormtail is really Beastly and they will be defeated with the Carebear Stare! Omg...I think I might have given myself crazy plot bunnies...argh!
I totally agree and this is often why I can't stand certain stories that are so popular, because frankly, I don't see much point in the story. If you aren't going to have plot or character development it just doesn't make sense to me. This is also why I feel changing the character too drastically doesn't make sense. Ok yes, I understand you gave Harry a different life and personality and goals...oh wait, how is that Harry? Sometimes it's like they made their own characters and stuffed them, badly, into HP characters' skins. I suppose that's an aside though.
I'm not a fluff or angst junkie and so many authors go waaay too far. Isn't it Refiner's Fire where Harry is CONSTANTLY beaten up and Harry and Ginny keep calling each other sweetheart and baby and *gags*. I totally wanted to vomit.
weird mental images
Ok yes, I understand you gave Harry a different life and personality and goals...oh wait, how is that Harry? Sometimes it's like they made their own characters and stuffed them, badly, into HP characters' skins. I suppose that's an aside though.
Well said. That said, this does bring some weird mental images to mind. I can't help seeing Harry and co done up like Vincent D'Onofrio's character Edgar from Men in Black - after the alien killed him ans put on his skin... :-)
-SC
'Isn't it Refiner's Fire
'Isn't it Refiner's Fire where Harry is CONSTANTLY beaten up and Harry and Ginny keep calling each other sweetheart and baby and *gags*. I totally wanted to vomit.'
There are several like that including some in the PS top ten. My biggest peeve is the 'something has to go wrong every chapter' fics. I prefer to see someone with a problem to deal with and a chance to deal with it.
I have no problem with a
I have no problem with a happy ending, but if there's no conflict in the story itself, there's no story, period.
My take on the whole 'changing the past' subset of stories is - okay, fine. Let Harry save Cedric. let him save Sirius. But then kill Cho, or Molly, or someone else in a way he couldn't predict.
But maybe that's just me.
Death is not the worst
I like it when authors understand that there are much worse things than death. I think that's one of the main reasons that Nightmares of Future's Past is so well regarded (personally I rank it as possibly my all time favorite). Viridian/S'Tarkan paints a... well, grim is an understatement, picture of what happened in Harry's original time line. To quote from Ginny in that story "...Things had turned out so horribly that she couldn’t picture any way it could have been worse. Even the Boy Who Lived died in the end."
Yeah...
Ok yes, I understand you gave Harry a different life and personality and goals...oh wait, how is that Harry? Sometimes it's like they made their own characters and stuffed them, badly, into HP characters' skins. I suppose that's an aside though.
Well said. That said, this does bring some weird mental images to mind. I can't help seeing Harry and co done up like Vincent D'Onofrio's character Edgar from Men in Black - after the alien killed him ans put on his skin... :-)
-SC
Yeah, sorry. I know it's a bit of a wierd mental image, but it seemed the best way to explain it at the time. Think of it more like their original character took polyjuice potion or something.